Writers Of The Future ~ Closing Arguments

If it seems like it’s been a bit since my last WOTF post, it’s because I couldn’t figure out how to sum up Scott Card’s pep talk on ending your story- he basically says that we’ve done the hard work already. We’ve set everything up, and now it’s time to defeat the bad guy and tie up the loose ends. Not very helpful, right?

And then there’s just a page with the definition of suspense.

suspense n.

1: the condition of being anxious and uncertain

2: the growing excitement felt as a story, play, etc., builds to a higher point

Webster

Now comes a decent article on suspense- add in the details! Slow down the action scenes, just long enough to give the reader room to feel dread and wonder what will happen.

If you were to take all the suspense out of a story, no matter how many unusual facts and characters you had in it, I don’t think it would be read very far.

If you were to take every blow of action out of a story and still leave its suspense (this is possible, because I’ve done it), you might still have a fine story, probably a better story than before.

L. Ron Hubbard

Most readers don’t just want to watch people fight. They want to care about the characters. and root for them. While you probably established motivations and such earlier, you want to still be able to feel what the characters are feeling and worry over the outcome.

The best way to do that is to slow down the action and add in bits that make you think that maybe- just maybe- our protag isn’t going to win. At least, not without pain, cunning, and timing.

You Are A Factory

L. Ron Hubbard is famous for two things: Writing and cult making. In this essay it’s really apparent- he approaches writing the same way a businessman would approach his product. He tallied up the number of words he wrote for each genre, and divided it by the number of words that ended up being sold.

He then goes through different factors of a business- supply and demand, in which you must be aware of who’s going to buy what, and how much competition you have.

The Plant- some of this, like typewriter ribbons, doesn’t necessarily apply anymore. But it is still important to have a comfortable, professional-ish space to work in. A place you can write for hours in without destroying your mental health. Hubbard wrote in his living room- I write on my bedroom desk or at the library. Stephen King has- or had- a home office. (His house is being converted into a writer’s retreat!)

Raw material- aka research! Go down to the place you whish to write about, and interview the people who work there. This might not be feasible for all types of stories, but try to find a similar place. With the Wild West, you might only have museums, but visiting the museum is better than doing no research at all.

Type of work- whatever you write best, find several different markets for it. That way if one turns you down, you can simply consult your list for the next best place to send it to. I have a masterdoc of everything I’ve submitted in the past year, including rejections. At the bottom of the page I keep a running list of possible places to submit, and their nearest deadlines.

Quality vs Quantity- Here he really shows that he does not have set writing hours. If he can think of nothing to write, he goes out for inspiration. If he feels like writing, he writes through the night and through illness. His idea is that if you do not feel like writing, you won’t be able to write anything of quality.

I personally disagree with this to an extent- if you don’t make yourself write, you will never get used to writing. But you do need to recognize when you need to go out for some inspiration.

Write sincerely and you are certain to write better and better.

L. Ron Hubbard

That wraps up the Writers Of The Future Workshop series! If you want to submit to the contest you can do so at writersofthefuture.com. The next submission deadline is Sept 30th, but it’s open quarterly.

Get a monthly haiku here! You can also donate to my glasses fund https://ko-fi.com/brittainxgoffy

Writers Of The Future ~ Drafting The Middle

Ahh, the middle. It can either be Catching Fire or it can be completely forgettable.

The most important thing to remember is that Act Two has to stand on it’s own. It has to justify its existence. Every scene should further the plot and point towards the eventual ending, but there has to be new discoveries made.

WOTF describes a try/fail cycle. The protagonist thinks they know enough about the problem to solve it, but ends up making it worse and discovering the bigger picture.

I am going to write about a character that doesn’t fit in at her job. She decides to quit, but her boss hypnotizes her into staying. They thought the fundamental problem was within them, and their solution was to move on. But she discovers that she actually works for a cult, and can’t leave.

The end of act 2 should be some kind of revelation or cliffhanger- at the end of Catching Fire, Peeta tries to kill Katniss after being rescued. Thus we have a newer, personal problem that makes the Capitol all the more eviler. It gives fresh energy into the rebellion that carries it into the fall of the Capitol.

Try writing a try/fail cycle and let me know how it goes!

Get a monthly haiku here! You can also donate to my glasses fund https://ko-fi.com/brittainxgoffy

Writers Of The Future ~ Day 4 ~ Drafting The Opening

Hey writers of the past, present, and future! I took a few days, but since I scheduled posting ahead of time you might actually be reading this day of.

Opening

Now we get to the actual drafting stage! David Farland takes us through different types of openings (Who is David Farland btw?)

1- Character opening. This is the stereotypical “Oh I woke up, and looked in the mirror” type opening, but it can also be used to establish their motivations, and why we should care about this person. In my last story, I opened with the main character recounting their most traumatic memory, which served as a jumping off point into finding out why this murder happened.

This would make the character interesting- they were somehow involved in this horrible event. But you can also go a softer route and make the character sympathetic- show them in pain, or doing something relatable/ likeable, like petting a cute puppy.

2- Conflict opening. This is pretty self explanatory- What is the Big Bad Problem? It could also be a little problem that somehow mirrors the larger problem, think Marvel movies. It gets the reader engaged, and shows them how our hero typically handles problems, and foreshadows why the “normal” way of solving things might not work in the future. And- if we go along with Marvel- it could show why they need to work as a team. Even when they disagree, they are fundamentally stronger together.

(You can replace “team” with anything- why the hero holds a certain value, why they’re in love with the villain, etc)

3- Setting opening– this one might be the toughest to pull off. Remember- you still need to be able to justify opening here. It’s not enough that spaceships are cool or that forests are pretty. This might work best for an nature protection narrative- the trees stand tall, sheltering a family of owls. The owlets are just starting to move around- they want to see what’s outside of their little enclave! 300 feet away, a human strikes a match to a grill, and tosses it onto a patch of dry woodchips- will the fire be controlled before it reaches the owlets?!

Bottom line- Hook the reader. Make the reader care, show them that there’s a story here.

Which kind of opening do you prefer?

Get a monthly haiku here! You can also donate to my glasses fund https://ko-fi.com/brittainxgoffy

Writers Of The Future ~ Day 3 ~ Dialogue

Hello… It’s the last day of Pride month for me, and I’m spending it reading a speech from someone who is not only homophobic, but is also ableist. Disappointed, but not surprised.

(Context: We’re going through dialogue and Scott Card had referred to a “Tourette’s Syndrome box when we want to use language calculated to offend or make us feel brave.”)

I think I have to take a step back from the workshop after this, as my glasses are in serious need of an update. If you would like to see how this series ends, please let me know.

Back to Scott Card, he taking us through so many examples of code switching- the way we speak to our moms vs the way we speak among sailors. The way we speak to a receptionist vs the way we speak with an intimate friend. We know what is acceptable language to use with each person.

He’s definitely not thinking about how neurodivergent people have to think about our words. Sometimes I become mute under stress, and I have to think and force each syllable out.

A good point that I’ve often heard: Use “said.” Don’t use “murmur” or “whispered” unless you’re trying to draw attention to the Way it’s being said. Unless you’re trying to distract from What is being said.

Another thing: you want the character’s relationships to show through dialogue. He tells the story of his grandma and grandpa, how his grandpa was notorious for telling bad jokes. Every time he’d repeat an old one, Grandma would groan and beg him not to tell that joke again. That is their relationship and history showing; think of Dan and Phil. They do the bants, they talk over each other. They are “best friends” with years and years of history. You can also tell each of their personalities from each other- Dan is depressed and gayforward, whereas Phil is a Northern Lad who refuses to swear. If you are ever struggling with dialogue between two people who are close, I suggest turning on DnP Games.

How do you write dialogue? Share a lil snippet of dialogue from your WIP!

Get a monthly haiku here! You can also donate to my glasses fund https://ko-fi.com/brittainxgoffy

Writers Of The Future ~ D2 ~ Outlining

Hello! Welcome, or welcome back! This is the third post in my Writers Of The Future Workshop series, but it’s still Wednesday for me. 2.17PM, to be exact.

I went in to the library, but the book I was hoping to get was checked out. Cultish centers around how cults and their leaders use manipulative language to get and keep their followers. I put in a request for it and got Anne Rice’s Violin instead. I’ve never actually read an Anne Rice book before because Interview With The Vampires is always checked out. I should just put in a request for it.

ANYWAYS back to the workshop.

Section 4: Outlines & Plotting

These people use a 7-point story structure:

1- The character- strengths & weaknesses.

2- Context- Where & When & Why

3- Problem- NOT the antagonist. The antagonist is there to bring the problem to the front of your mind- it is also their problem, but from a different angle. Maybe they think this form of government is awesome because they don’t know of any other way. Maybe they’re scared because they will have to find another way to live if this regime is toppled. But the REAL problem is the government, it’s structure, it’s hold on people.

4- Start the middle/ Protag attempts to solve this problem. Perhaps they run for office.

5- Protag fails, and realizes that the problem is much more complex. Maybe they won, but the system won’t let any of their measures pass, or they become corrupted by the system. Maybe they lost, and have to find a way to dismantle the system from the outside.

6- Transformation- Protag has to shed old beliefs and accept new ones. They have come to realize that the system is inherently corrupt, and the only way to change things is viva la revolution.

7- Ending is validated- we see some sort of action that says “yes, this character’s actions changed the world.” A new form of government might be put into place, or maybe it’s something smaller, like the antag coming to the protag’s side.

Have you outlined this way before? Are you normally a plotter or a panster?

Writers Of The Future Workshop ~ Day 2

Wednesday, the day before

Section 3: Research & Homework

This section opens with an essay on Jack London- he’d go to bars and buy a drink for a sailor. Besides being incredibly gay, (at one point it says “Jack London never allowed his interest in men to lag. And because of that, he grew to know men and could write about them and what they did and why.” it also proves that you cannot write about a subject unless you know them, really know them. You must be interested, and continue to be interested.

But now there’s the point- we aren’t interested in our homes. We don’t care about that neighbor, or the postman, or the grocery store clerk. We don’t find our everyday lives interesting, so we look to famous foreign cities we haven’t a hope of visiting. But then we get it wrong, and the locals jeer at us. So what to do?

Travel. Or “circulate” as Hubby puts it. (Yes, I’m calling L. Ron Hubbard “Hubby”) But this, DO NOT DO THIS. DO NOT TRAVEL. But you can still read and talk with people without risking anyone’s health. Get a penpal, or many penpals. Find workshops or other events hosted by people with Experience and Knowledge.

~ One of the things is to talk to someone, preferable smarter than you, about a subject you’re interested in. For this bit, I signed up a class on cults, which won’t start until August, but I talked to someone about starting it so I’m checking it off.~

The three elements for “Story Vitality” are “(1) a clear and recognizable character (2) in a detailed setting (3) who is doing something interesting.” He goes on to tell how he strolled down to the docks to find some Coast Guard officers to talk to, one who scoffed at him, and one who took him seriously. He was able to double the wordcount of the story he was writing with these details, just from a few hours at the docks.

“Writers are the laziest people on earth. And I know I’m the laziest writer.”

L. Ron Hubbard

One thing- get encyclopedias. I used to have a collection of secondhand encyclopedias that I would just flip through. It mentioned things like the Olympians, or electric vehicles. The course just mentions going through the library, finding offhand little bits that interest you, and making up stories to explain why that little bit is. Encyclopedias are really expensive, hence getting them secondhand. It also helped that it was aimed at teens.

I need a lil break, and you might too. I’m going to go to the library and come back in a few hours. We probably won’t finish the series before the deadline, but we’ll see how far along we get. Try doing this task with me: Go to the library, to the nonfiction section, and find a book on a subject you’re interested in but don’t know much about.

If you do the task, please comment! Which book did you get?

Writers Of The Future Workshop~ Day 1

Writers Of The Future logo

Tuesday, 2 Days Before Submission

Section 1: Course Introduction

I legit get the creeps from these old white men. The first video is mostly David Farland, who is clearly reading off of a teleprompter. His face is slack, and I scroll down the transcript in order to avoid it.

He explains the basics of the course, and a tiny bit about the history of it. He does not mention that the founder, L. Ron Hubbard, also founded Scientology. I did a bit of research into it after Kate Cavanaugh’s video- It’s basically a group of very rich people who pay to be imprisoned at a site in Riverside, CA. They believe that by disclosing their deepest, darkest, (blackmailable) secrets and paying so much money, they will reach various stages of enlightenment. At the highest stage, their souls separate from their bodies and they learn the “truth”- that humans were dropped into a volcano by aliens, and in the confusion, their souls escaped by possessing the bodies of humans.

So basically exactly like a cult made up by a sci-fi author.

Back to the workshop- not technically connected to Scientology today but it’s still sus enough to worth mentioning.

Section Two – Story Ideas

Some interesting points- Hubbard believed that, with time, the first draft should also be the last draft. The author has “conditioned himself to think as he writes.” While thinking, throw in something random, like a goldfish on an airplane. The goldfish gets your attention, and keeps you asking questions. Even if the goldfish ends up being written out, it triggered the thinking process and got you writing.

This essay is followed by a talk by Orson Scott Card the Homophobe. His talk is titles 1,001 Story Ideas In An Hour. In an interactive class, they would start with a cliche. In his talk, he gives the example of a 23 year old woman. What is she doing with her life? She could be in grad school, she could be causally dating, and just trying to establish her career. Why? Is she in grad school because she loves the subject? Why does she date the people that she dates? Why isn’t she in an monogamous relationship?

Why? Why? Why?

The story isn’t about what happens. It’s about people, and struggles. Why won’t they just give up? Why did they press that button? Why did they fumble with their keys?

I end this post at Sec 2, but please note that I’m scheduling this post after the contest ends, just in case they find this and block me from the workshop. I did use a false name, but you can never be too careful.

Midyear Book Freakout Tag 2022

So far I’ve read 24 books, which seems low but apparently I’m 6 books ahead of my official goal of 36 books. I purposely placed it low since I’m in my last year of college, but unofficially my goal is 52 books. Half of that is 26, but I’m not really worried since I’ve been in a hyper reading mode lately.

Anyways, let’s get into the questions!

Best book you’ve read so far in 2022

I Will Never See The World Again. It’s literally unheard of, but I found it while during the Reads The World challenge on StoryGraph. It’s a memoir from a Turkish prison, by a writer who really didn’t do anything but was a casualty of a post-riot sweep. It’s beautifully written and full of points on morality and writing.

Always Human

Best sequel so far in 2022

The only sequels I’ve read are the Heartstopper sequels and Always Human 2. DON’T HATE ME but Always Human is so beautiful and a touching portrayal of an early sapphic relationship. It wins out by just a smidge, although plot-wise HS has more going for it.

Best new release so far in 2022

~Poverty~ but let’s see… I’ve read All That’s Left In The World, Love & Other Disasters, and… that’s it. Both of these books were pretty mid, TBH. Although I suppose I’d pick L&OD of the two. It’s an adult NBLW cooking romance.

New release you need to get to

I thought I preordered Hell Followed With Us by AJ White, but there was a problem processing it and I had to order it again… Still haven’t gotten it *Sigh* The brief synopsis I needed was Trans Guy Monstrous Cult.

Most anticipated release in the second half of 2022

I only found out about this recently and I NEED IT! Self-Made Boys is a Great Gatsby retelling from the one and only AM McLemore.

Biggest Disappointment

Myself.

And Summer Sons. Dark Academia in generally, really. I really love the idea of it, but the books are a hit or miss. Summer Sons specifically had a race car element that I wasn’t expecting and didn’t enjoy, and he was in a situationship with his adopted brother…

Most surprising book

I’m going to have to go with I Will Never See The World Again. I had it on my shelf for AGES, interested enough not to return it, but not interested enough to read it before it was due.

Most beautiful book cover

The Sea In You

What books do you need to read before the end of 2022

Oh Boi.

My immediate TBR consists of The Beekeeper Of Aleppo, Zorro (yes, that Zorro) Cobalt Blue, See You At Harry’s, Island Of The Lost, Used Aliens, and Pretty Things. I don’t even know what some of these books are about, but I live in a rural area and can’t complain when I find a new book.

In addition to that, my CRs are The Art Of Death, a writing craftsbook, and Annihilation, a sci-fi story that’s supposed to be as weird as Bunny but just going by the first chapter, it’s not written in a very accessible way. I don’t mean big words, I mean weird phrasing that doesn’t really allow me to sink in.

How has your reading year gone so far? Have to read or plan to read any of these books?

So You’ve Read ~ A GoodReads Scroll

Everyone gets them, unless you’ve figured out how to turn them off. The GoodReads emails that begin “You’ve finished (Book title here). Here are some ideas on what you can do next.”

And I’m not gonna lie, I absolutely love the “Readers also enjoyed” lists!

The Alchemist

This book is an “inspirational” book in novel form. It beseeches the reader/ shepherd boy to find your/ his “personal legend.” So naturally, the “Books similar” list includes The Subtle Art Of Not Giving A F*ck, Eat, Pray, Love, and How To Win Friends And Influence People. There’s also a lot of “classic” books like To Kill A Mockingbird, Animal Farm, and Life Of Pi, which aren’t necessarily self-help books but they’re books you’ve heard of and are designed to make you think.

Heartstopper

If you don’t know what Heartstopper is, why are you reading this blog?

In terms of recs, there’s a weird disparity between what’s in the email and what’s actually on the list. In the email there’s your good queer comics like Bloom and The Prince and The Dressmaker. There’s also The Girl In The Sea, which I haven’t read yet but I desperately want to. Not listed, but if you’re looking for other gay webcomics, I HIGHLY recommend Always Human. It’s a gorgeous, gorgeous lesbian love story set in the 23rd century.

El Deafo

El Deafo is a graphic novel catered towards young kids. It follows a deaf girl who believes her hearing aid gives her superpowers. It’s also a memoir! The list is full of other graphic novels for young readers like Roller Girl, Drama, Ghosts, Real Friends, and Invisible Emmie.

The Death Of Vivek Oji

There’s so many books I hadn’t heard of before in this list. Vivek Oji was a trans person in Nigeria, where queerness isn’t exactly accepted. It’s a very beautifully written book, but they have an incesterous relationship with their cousin, and there’s a lot of other trigger warnings. If you plan on reading this, please make sure you’re in the right headspace for it.

The books include Sleepless Night, The Murmur Of Bees, Braised Pork, and Fledgling.

This Is How You Lose The Time War

Short and awesome scifi time travel book for the sapphics, if you haven’t read this already you NEED to. The books include The Imaginary Corpse, Gideon The Ninth, The Murders Of Molly Southbourne, and Miranda In Milan. I absolutely loved Molly Southbourne, if you’re a fan of the weird, twisted narratives, try to find a copy.

Have you read any of these books? How has your experience been with GR recs?

These Queer Books Are Not Underhyped ~ A Rant

We’ve all seen the tweet “Can anyone rec me some UNDERHYPED queer books? I’ve read most of the popular ones.” And maybe you’ve made one of these! Maybe you replied to them, hopefully with some genuinely unheard of books.

But the replies include the likes of, can you guess? RED WHITE AND ROYAL BLUE, THE RAVEN BOYS, SIMON VS THE HOMOSAPIENS AGENDA, and last, but not least, HEARTSTOPPER.

And I’m not saying these books aren’t great, they are! I love these books, and they’re popular for a reason. They just don’t belong in Underhyped book spaces.

What if you’re not sure if a book is underhyped or not? The easiest way to check is to look at how many Goodreads ratings they have. I personally define an “underhyped book” as one that has less than 5K ratings.

But there are books that are older and have the ratings, but they just haven’t been talked about in a while. These books are still not underhyped, but they can still be brought into the convo as long as you acknowledge it as such.

Also, have there been any movie or show adaptation of these books? Because I can guarantee you that if there was anyone left in the world who had not read Heartstopper before the show, they have now. If they don’t they’re just homophobic.

I want to be able to see these twitter threads, blog posts, or YT videos and find out about books I’ve never heard of. These are the books that may have been ignored because they didn’t get hype and support by their publishers. Their authors are still working day jobs, and probably didn’t even get paid for their beautiful books beyond a minor advance.

These stories need to be told. The ones that are by queers, for queers, and don’t pare it down to appeal to an allocishet audience. These are the BIPOC queers, whose stories are woven with the histories and cultures that a lot of white readers don’t want to think about. These are the stories that are full of rightful trans rage.

These are the underhyped queer stories.